The real dominant Linux failure, identified by a CCR Linux repro.
A CCR container reproduced the production signature — non-zero exit +
EMPTY stdout + EMPTY stderr (~60k fires/day, 4,485 Linux users on 2.0.4):
running `python -m venv` under a tight memory limit (ulimit -v) kills the
memory-heavy venv+ensurepip/pip subprocess with SIGSEGV (-11, RLIMIT_AS)
or SIGKILL (-9, kernel OOM-killer) BEFORE it writes anything. This is
NOT the ensurepip/packaging case (that always writes to stderr, code 11)
and NOT fixable by --target (a --target pip install is also memory-heavy
and gets killed too). Three earlier hypotheses (stdout, packaging,
Option A fixes Linux) were wrong — the repro corrected them.
Changes:
- Detect the signal kill (rc<0, or 128+sig: 134/137/139) in the venv/pip
and --target paths → err_kind "signal_killed:<rc>" (new code 16). The
returncode rides in a new sdk_bootstrap_rc metric so prod confirms
which signal dominates (-9 OOM-killer vs -11 RLIMIT_AS).
- Cooldown: on a signal kill, write a marker and return the new
SKIP_COOLDOWN outcome (9) on subsequent sessions for 24h — stops the
retry storm (every session was re-attempting a build that just gets
re-killed, burning the user's memory/CPU). Retries once per window so a
machine that frees memory still recovers.
- --no-cache-dir on both pip installs (venv + --target) trims pip's peak
memory; may get marginal machines under the OOM threshold.
No happy-path change: signal detection is at the top of the existing
failure handler; cooldown is checked only after all no-op probes
(NOOP_SYSTEM/VENV/TARGET short-circuit first).
Verified locally on macOS Python 3.13:
- py_compile clean.
- 35 new tests (test_signal_kill_cooldown.py): _is_signal_kill across
signals/exit-codes, rc decode, signal_killed→code 16, cooldown
lifecycle (none→write→expire), and an integration flow — simulated
SIGKILL'd venv → BUILD_FAILED/signal_killed:-9 + cooldown written →
2nd run SKIP_COOLDOWN without re-attempting → retry after window;
non-signal failure does NOT cool down; --no-cache-dir present on both
pip paths; sdk_bootstrap_rc emitted conditionally.
- End-to-end harness: the full kill→categorize→cooldown→skip→retry
chain confirmed in-process.
The original CCR repro (ulimit -v ≤7000 KB → rc=-11, empty streams) is
the ground truth this fix is built on. Can be re-validated on CCR with the
same ulimit approach.
Version 2.0.5 -> 2.0.6 per the per-PR-bump policy (#2114).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
security-guidance
Security review for Claude-generated code. Three layers:
- Pattern warnings — instant regex-based reminders on
Edit/Writefor ~25 known-dangerous patterns (yaml.load,torch.load(weights_only=False),pickle.loadon untrusted data, rawinnerHTML, hardcoded secrets, etc.). - LLM diff review — when Claude finishes a turn, the plugin sends the diff to a fast LLM call (Opus 4.7 by default) and feeds high-severity findings back to Claude so it can fix them before you see the response.
- Agentic commit review — on
git commit, an SDK-driven reviewer reads related files (Read/Grep/Glob) to trace data flow across the codebase, catching multi-file vulnerabilities pattern matching misses (IDOR, auth bypass, cross-file SSRF).
Findings cover common web-vulnerability classes — injection, XSS, SSRF, hardcoded secrets, IDOR, auth bypass, unsafe deserialization, and path traversal among others.
Install
/plugin install security-guidance@claude-plugins-official
Marketplace ships enabled by default in Claude Code — no setup beyond having the CLI itself.
Prerequisites
- Claude Code CLI ≥ v2.1.144
- Python 3.8+ on
PATH(python3,python, orpy -3— the plugin picks the first that works) - A working API path (subscription, API key, or 3P provider config)
Configuration
All configuration is via environment variables. None are required for default behavior.
Selecting a model
# 1P / gateway: a canonical model id
SECURITY_REVIEW_MODEL=claude-opus-4-7 # default
# Bedrock: use the inference-profile id
SECURITY_REVIEW_MODEL=us.anthropic.claude-opus-4-7
# Vertex: use the Vertex date-tag form
SECURITY_REVIEW_MODEL=claude-opus-4-7@20260218
SECURITY_REVIEW_MODEL controls the LLM diff review. SG_AGENTIC_MODEL (same syntax) controls the agentic commit reviewer; defaults to the same model.
Enabling/disabling layers
| Variable | Default | What it does |
|---|---|---|
SECURITY_GUIDANCE_DISABLE=1 |
unset | Kill switch — disables the entire plugin |
ENABLE_PATTERN_RULES=0 |
on | Disable layer 1 (regex pattern warnings) |
ENABLE_CODE_SECURITY_REVIEW=0 |
on | Disable all LLM reviews (Stop hook + commit/push) |
ENABLE_STOP_REVIEW=0 |
on | Disable only the Stop-hook diff review, keeping commit/push reviews. Useful for multi-agent / shared-worktree setups where another agent can move HEAD between a worker's turns |
ENABLE_COMMIT_REVIEW=0 |
on | Disable layer 3 (agentic commit review) |
Higher-recall mode
SG_DUAL_OR=on # default off
Runs two parallel review calls and unions the findings. Catches a few percentage points more vulnerabilities in our testing, at roughly 2× the API cost per review. Most users don't need it.
Org-specific policies
Drop a claude-security-guidance.md in any of:
~/.claude/claude-security-guidance.md— user-wide rules<project>/.claude/claude-security-guidance.md— project rules, intended to be committed<project>/.claude/claude-security-guidance.local.md— local overrides, intended to be.gitignore'd
All three are loaded and concatenated into the LLM diff review's prompt in the order user → project → project-local. If the combined size exceeds the 8 KB prompt budget, the tail is truncated, so user-wide rules are kept and project-local rules are dropped first. The agentic commit reviewer (layer 3) does not currently read this file. Example:
# Acme security rules
- All SELECTs against the `customers` or `orders` tables MUST go through `db.replica`,
never `db.primary`. Primary is for writes only.
- Background jobs must not use the user-context auth token; they get
service-account creds from `jobs.get_service_account()`.
- Calls to `requests.get(url)` with a user-controlled `url` need
the SSRF-allowlist wrapper at `acme.net.safe_request`.
Built-in rules cover common web-vulnerability classes without it — claude-security-guidance.md is for things specific to your codebase that the model can't infer.
Privacy and data handling
The plugin sends data to a model endpoint to perform its reviews. Specifically, each Stop-hook diff review transmits the changed file paths, the diff hunks, and the relevant file contents in the diff; each agentic commit review additionally transmits any files the reviewer pulls in via Read/Grep/Glob while tracing data flow. Your claude-security-guidance.md contents (user, project, and local) are appended to the prompt on every review, so don't put secrets in it.
Where that data goes depends on your Claude Code configuration:
- Default (Anthropic API / subscription): sent to
api.anthropic.comand handled under Anthropic's Commercial Terms and Privacy Policy. - LLM gateway (
ANTHROPIC_BASE_URLset): sent to your gateway URL instead. The gateway operator's terms apply. - 3rd-party providers (Bedrock / Vertex / Foundry / Mantle): sent to your configured provider endpoint. The provider's data-handling terms apply (e.g., AWS / GCP / Azure).
The plugin writes its own debug log to ~/.claude/security/log.txt (override with SECURITY_GUIDANCE_DEBUG_LOG). The log contains diffstate metadata and finding categories — no full file contents or model prompts — and rotates at 1 MB. Nothing is uploaded.
Limitations
This is a best-effort assistive tool, not a guarantee. Treat findings as suggestions, not as a substitute for human code review, SAST/DAST, dependency scanning, or pen-testing. The reviewer can miss vulnerabilities, produce false positives, and may behave differently across codebases, languages, and model versions. No warranty is provided — use is subject to Anthropic's Commercial Terms.
Troubleshooting
Plugin doesn't seem to fire — check that ~/.claude/claude-security-guidance.md (or hook activity) shows in debug logs. Run Claude Code with --debug-file /tmp/claude/debug.txt and grep for security_reminder_hook. The plugin also writes its own log to ~/.claude/security/log.txt.
Review never finds anything — verify your API path works. On 3P providers, check SECURITY_REVIEW_MODEL is set to a provider-specific id (not a bare claude-opus-4-7). On LLM gateways, check the gateway's logs for POST /v1/messages traffic from the plugin.
Too many false positives — drop SECURITY_REVIEW_MODEL to a cheaper model (claude-sonnet-4-6) and re-evaluate; if precision is the priority, stay on Opus 4.7.
Want to silence a specific finding — add a comment to the line explaining why it's safe; the LLM reviewer treats inline justifications as exclusions. For systemic exclusions, document them in your claude-security-guidance.md.
Reporting issues
Open an issue on the security-guidance plugin repo with:
- The Claude Code CLI version (
claude --version) - Provider setup (1P / Bedrock / Vertex / LLM gateway / etc.)
- A minimal repro diff
- The relevant section of
~/.claude/security/log.txt